How Safe Is My Child From Social Corruption?

Part of being a parent is knowing how safe is your child in any given situation. However, one situation that many people do not consider to ask may actually come as quite as a surprise.

How Safe Is My Child From Social Corruption?

While on the surface this looks like the template for most general questions that a parent may ask, especially since we have a tendency to turn the social majority during times of need. Turning to society when asking if your child is safe from social corruption is like asking a crackhead if your crack rock is safe with him. In the case of the crack head, we can all agree and plainly see that would not be a wise choice. When it comes to getting society’s opinion on keeping your child safe from social corruption we mysteriously become blind to wisdom and logic.

Instinctive Protection For Your Child

First, when it comes to answering any issues of how safe your child is, it should always be remembered that while they are still young and unable to make their own sensible decisions. It is this lack of decision-making development that a child truly is never safe. A parent has to be on guard against everything, everyone, and at everyplace 24/7, 365 days a year. This deep sense of protection for children is something so instinctive that it is something that most of us do not even have to think about, we simply just do it. The thing about society and social corruption is that they attempt to mislead you into believing that they too are a result of instinct, thus they should be treated as such.

Yes, it is true that society has been around in various manifestations since the creation of man. The thing about these previous societies though is that they greatly differed in their demographics, ideas, and time frame than our own. In the status quo, society attempts to tell you that it has not changed for years, just like the instinctive need to protect a child. It is just something that you go with the flow on when it comes to being alive on earth and interacting with general society.

The instinctive NEED to protect a child is a part of our evolution that has not changed the least bit over the course of time.

Society on the other hand has changed many times and will change many more during a lifetime. It is this perpetual state of change and the use of many metaphorical masks that you should really consider asking how safe is your child from social corruption? Am I the only one that feels threatened, paranoid, and unsafe at the thought of seeing society as just another part of life we go through and never change, just one more lie to the list?

Am I the only one that is worried for the future of our children when they grow up and only know social corruption?

I would like to think that I am not the only parent worried about social corruption having an effect on the life of my child. Something to keep in mind here, there is a difference in social corruption and morality, what may be considered justice in one may be taboo in the other. One thing that you definitely know now when it comes to how safe is your child from social corruption is that they are not safe at all. In fact, social corruption is one of the most dangerous poisons to our children and their minds. Teach your child to critically, creatively, and candidly ask questions about how society works and how do the people within it live. The biggest step that any parent can make for their child is to raise them with an open mind, open heart, and a soul opposed to social constructs.

Breaking Social Constructs: Natures Time Not Our Own

When it comes to breaking social constructs there is one major thing to always remember, we are not on our own time. We are in fact on the time that we have borrowed from nature because without it we wouldn't have life in the first place.

Its funny though...

Everyone in the world is always rush rush rush...and each thing they are rushing too is another event or place that has been created within a society that is covered up with a cancer. The difference between the cancer of society when compared to regular cancer? This is a cancer that we can cure because it is a cancer that we have created.

Don't get me wrong, I partake in the pleasures and technology of modern times. However, one thing that I always try to do is set aside a little bit of time to appreciate nature and the things that the Universe has done for me.

Our souls all sing to the tune of 10,000 Natural Kinds, but can you hear the music?

 Take the time out to listen to its sweet music. I am sure that in doing at least one thing daily on natures time and not our own, that you will be a much happier person and already taken a step to
breaking social constructs.

Breaking Social Constructs: Women In Porn

Marilyn Monroe is probably one of the most recognized people to ever engage in the Adult Industry. She was a true visionary when it came to breaking social constructs.

When it comes to social constructs, ideas, and controversy one that is vastly popular is the belief that pornography is degrading, immoral, and humiliating to women. Since the first pornographic material was published in the US there has always been a strong opposition to it, largely by religious and women rights groups claiming that it is the poster child for sexual immorality. These groups have helped instill a deep and persistent belief in our society that women who participate in the adult industry are directly harmful to the strides that have been made in women rights. However, this negative bias is founded in the individual interests of opposition groups, is destructive to the entrepreneurial spirit of America, and totally undermines the rights of women. It is for these reasons that breaking social constructs involved in porn and related industries are essential to the further ideological evolution of the United States.

Until recent times, nearly all religious organizations took a strict stance against any kind of behavior that they defined as sexual immorality. This not only included the topic of gay marriage but the adult industry as well. The difference between these two at the present time is that religious groups are breaking away from the law of their social constructs when it comes to marriage bur are still standing firm in their perception of the adult industry. So why the change in one and not the other? If religious groups caved in on both these issues then their entire theology system would crumble under their acceptance of porn, no matter how conditional any form of acceptance would be.

The reasoning for women rights group sticking with this principle, instead of adopting beliefs breaking social constructs with the issue, are very similar to those of religious groups. One of the main differences between the two exists in the fact that the religious ideas that advocate this stance have been around much longer than any women rights group. Essentially, this is a philosophy for them that was rooted in the good intentions of empowering women, but the bad idea of something that does not take into consideration the evolution of women and their beliefs in modern times. Now it is far too late for any of these groups to back out, they are so entrenched with this as one of the main pillars that it would nullify any clout that they have with their primary issues.

This social construct also represents a major blow for the entrepreneurial spirit of America. Breaking social constructs in this area would allow for growth in the entrepreneurial spirit of America by empowering other people who may desire to work in an area that is also diluted with unnecessary controversy. When people are afraid that their ideas will not be accepted by the majority of society they often choose not to go through with them. Anytime that people do not take on a business venture it is directly taking away from the flow of money that is possible in the economy. The monetary implications for the individual, the economy of a nation, and the creation of markets not governed by set principles should be more than enough to show how the status quo is only destroying the entrepreneurial spirit of America.

Furthermore, if action is not taken on breaking the social constructs of this currently flawed belief it will result in the demolition of the rights of women in the future. For the women who choose to make pornography their career choice it can be very empowering, freeing, and spiritually satisfying experience. These women of the adult industry have wisely taken a carnal desire of an audience mostly comprised of men and managed to shape it into a legitimate, though very high in controversy, form of marketing and job opportunity. When a person, male or female, makes a conscious and willing decision to enter into a venture largely surrounded by negativity they truly do become extremely powerful in their niche once the silence of the majority no longer matters. How can this ever be a bad thing when the people in the porn industry are largely happy with career choice?

Finally, breaking the social constructs of this concept would result in many positive benefits for the United States. Though religious and groups that advocate the rights of women will have a more difficult time reaping any benefit from breaking the social constructs involved in the adult industry and pornographic material, the entrepreneurial spirit of America will almost immediately see positive results. Though I realize the controversy that my view on an established social construct will create, especially one that involves women and sexual immorality, I stand by my belief that a change is imperative for the betterment of society as a whole.

In conclusion, any time that I stop and look at the perception of the majority I always ask myself if things could be better with a change than what they are in the status quo. What if these groups at least ceased their acts that perpetuate the controversy of porn and the adult industry? How could a mass liberation and recolonization of the entrepreneurial spirit of America be transformed in accepting this industry as such? Where did your own thoughts on this issue fall at the beginning of this article compared to now? Or if you simply have general comments about breaking the social constructs of women in porn then please comment.